4.7 Article

Controversies in Meta-Analyses Results on Cardiac Cell-Based Regenerative Studies

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 118, Issue 8, Pages 1254-1263

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307347

Keywords

heart failure; myocardial infarction; meta-analysis; outcome measures; stem cells

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [UM1 HL087365, UM1 HL087318, 5 UM1 HL087318-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In contrast to multiple publication-based meta-analyses involving clinical cardiac regeneration therapy in patients with recent myocardial infarction, a recently published meta-analysis based on individual patient data reported no effect of cell therapy on left ventricular function or clinical outcome. A comprehensive review of the data collection, statistics, and the overall principles of meta-analyses provides further clarification and explanation for this controversy. The advantages and pitfalls of different types of meta-analyses are reviewed here. Each meta-analysis approach has a place when pivotal clinical trials are lacking and sheds light on the magnitude of the treatment in a complex healthcare field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available