4.5 Review

Haemophilia gene therapy: Progress and challenges

Journal

BLOOD REVIEWS
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 321-328

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.03.002

Keywords

Haemophilia; Factor VIII; Factor IX; Gene therapy; Vectors

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0902219] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0902219] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0902219] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10071] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Rosetrees Trust [M196] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current treatment for haemophilia entails life-long intravenous infusion of clotting factor concentrates. This is highly effective at controlling and preventing haemorrhage and its associated complications. Clotting factor replacement therapy is, however, demanding, exceedingly expensive and not curative. In contrast, gene therapy for haemophilia offers the potential of a cure as a result of continuous endogenous expression of biologically active factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) proteins following stable transfer of a normal copy of the respective gene. Our group has recently established the first clear proof-of-concept for a gene therapy approach to the treatment of severe haemophilia B. This entails a single intravenous administration of an adeno-associated virus vector encoding an optimised FIX gene, resulting in a long-term (>4 years) dose dependent increase in plasma FIX levels at therapeutic levels without persistent or late toxicity. Gene therapy therefore has the potential to change the treatment paradigm for haemophilia but several hurdles need to be overcome before this can happen. This review provides a summary of the progress made to date and discusses the remaining changes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available