4.7 Article

Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species, Reactive Nitrogen Species, and Redox-Dependent Signaling in the Cardiovascular System: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages E39-E75

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/RES.0000000000000110

Keywords

AHA Scientific Statements; free radicals; oxidants; peroxides; reactive nitrogen species; reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. NIH [HL038206, HL095070, HL55477, GM103492, R01-HL115114-04, R01 HL124116-01A1]
  2. British Heart Foundation [RG/13/7/30099, RE/13/5/30177, CH/12/4/29762]
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. AHA
  5. NIH
  6. British Heart Foundation [RG/13/7/30099] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species are biological molecules that play important roles in cardiovascular physiology and contribute to disease initiation, progression, and severity. Because of their ephemeral nature and rapid reactivity, these species are difficult to measure directly with high accuracy and precision. In this statement, we review current methods for measuring these species and the secondary products they generate and suggest approaches for measuring redox status, oxidative stress, and the production of individual reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. We discuss the strengths and limitations of different methods and the relative specificity and suitability of these methods for measuring the concentrations of reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species in cells, tissues, and biological fluids. We provide specific guidelines, through expert opinion, for choosing reliable and reproducible assays for different experimental and clinical situations. These guidelines are intended to help investigators and clinical researchers avoid experimental error and ensure high-quality measurements of these important biological species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available