4.4 Article

Polyphony of domestic dog whines and vocal cues to body size

Journal

CURRENT ZOOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 165-176

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoaa042

Keywords

acoustic communication; Canis familiaris; companion dogs; high-frequency calls; nonlinear phenomena; vocalization

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-00037]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-00037] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the frequency and temporal traits of whines in adult companion dogs, finding that whines had multiple independent fundamental frequencies and were negatively correlated with the body mass of the dogs. Whines could be emitted as monophonic, biphonic, or polyphonic calls, and high-frequency whines shared acoustic similarities with rodent ultrasonic calls.
In domestic dogs Canis familiaris, vocal traits have been investigated for barks and growls, and the relationship between individual body size and vocal traits investigated for growls, with less corresponding information for whines. In this study, we examined the frequency and temporal traits of whines of 20 adult companion dogs (9 males, 11 females), ranging in body mass from 3.5 to 70.0 kg and belonging to 16 breeds. Dog whines (26-71 per individual, 824 in total) were recorded in conditioned begging contexts modeled by dog owners. Whines had 3 independent fundamental frequencies: the low, the high and the ultra-high that occurred singly as monophonic calls or simultaneously as 2-voice biphonic or 3-voice polyphonic calls. From the smallest to largest dog, the upper frequency limit varied from 0.24 to 2.13 kHz for the low fundamental frequency, from 2.95 to 10.46 kHz for the high fundamental frequency and from 9.99 to 23.26 kHz for the ultra-high fundamental frequency. Within individuals, the low fundamental frequency was lower in monophonic than in biphonic whines, whereas the high fundamental frequency did not differ between those whine types. All frequency variables of the low, high, and ultra-high fundamental frequencies correlated negatively with dog body mass. For duration, no correlation with body mass was found. We discuss potential production mechanisms and sound sources for each fundamental frequency; point to the acoustic similarity between high-frequency dog whines and rodent ultrasonic calls and hypothesize that ultra-high fundamental frequencies function to allow private, tete-a-tete communication between members of social groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available