4.5 Article

m Prognostic Implications of Non-Invasive Vascular Function Tests in High-Risk Atherosclerosis Patients

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 1034-1040

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1356

Keywords

Cardiovascular event; Endothelial function; Kidney function; Vascular function

Funding

  1. JSPS [15K19381, 25293184]
  2. Japan Heart Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25293184, 15K19381, 16H05299] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the role of clinically available vascular function tests as predictors of cardiovascular events and decline in kidney function. Methods and Results: One hundred and fourteen patients who had at least 2 cardiovascular risk factors were recruited for vascular function assessment including ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and flow-mediated vasodilatation (%FMD). During a median period of 51 months, 35 patients reached the primary endpoint (29 cardiovascular events and 6 cardiac deaths), and 30 patients reached the secondary endpoint (decline in kidney function: defined as a 5% per year decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate). In sequential Cox models, a model on the basis of the Framingham risk score, hemoglobin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (chi-squared, 16.6) was improved by the ABI (chisquared: 21.5; P=0.047). The baPWV (hazard ratio: 1.42 per 1 SD increase; P=0.025) and the CAVI (hazard ratio: 1.52 per 1 SD increase; P=0.040) were associated with the secondary endpoint. The %FMD was only slightly associated with the primary and secondary endpoints. Conclusions: Both ABI and baPWV are significantly associated with future cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease. The predictive capabilities of these parameters are greater than that of other parameters in this cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available