4.7 Review

Investigating food insecurity measurement globally to inform practice locally: a rapid evidence review

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 61, Issue 20, Pages 3319-3339

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1798347

Keywords

Food insecurity; food poverty; measurement; rapid review; inequality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines methods of measuring food insecurity globally and focuses on the UK's adoption of the US HFSSM for monitoring annual food insecurity. Most literature on the topic comes from North America, with the HFSSM being the most commonly used indicator. Developed countries are increasingly concerned about food insecurity, using a variety of indicators to report on the severity of the issue.
The objective of this review was to examine the methods used to measure food insecurity (FI) globally, to inform considerations relating to adopting a novel, or reviewing an existing, FI measurement approach in developed countries. Considerations for measurement are examined with particular applicability to the United Kingdom (UK) which has recently announced adoption of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) as an indicator to facilitate annual FI monitoring. This study uses a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodological approach to systematically review the literature on FI measurement and considers: geographical jurisdiction, methodological approach, sampling strategy, FI indicator(s) used, and implications for measurement. Results found that the majority of papers reviewed emanate from North America with theUS Household Food Security Scale Module (HFSSM)and its various adapted forms being the most commonly reported indicator. FI is becoming a key concern within developed countries with a range of indicators being used to report on the severity of the issue. This paper provides a contribution to knowledge by: (i) identifying various approaches to FI measurement and commonalities of existing measurement approaches; (ii) providing a summation of the methodologies and findings of studies relating to FI measurement, and associated implications for measurement, (iii) providing a justification evidenced by the literature for the adoption of the HFSSM in the UK; and (iv) assessing the methodological usefulness of a REA review. Understanding the components of robust FI indicators and their effectiveness can help inform existing and novel measurement approaches to ensure that data collected on FI are meaningful and thereby useful to inform future policy work in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available