4.7 Review

Mechanisms, physiology, and recent research progress of gastric emptying

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 61, Issue 16, Pages 2742-2755

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1784841

Keywords

Age; digestion; gastric emptying; in vitro model; physiology

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY18C200005]
  2. project of Zhejiang Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition [2017SICR103]
  3. Talent Project of Zhejiang Association for Science and Technology [2018YCGC235]
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/000PR10345, BBS/E/F/00044418] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric emptying is a crucial process where the stomach releases its contents into the small intestine for further digestion and absorption, with factors such as calories, viscosity, food composition, age and gender playing important roles. In vitro digestion models are essential for studying gastric emptying when in vivo tests are not feasible, and progress in static and dynamic gastric digestion models are highlighted in this review to explore future research trends.
Gastric emptying refers to a process in which the stomach discharges its contents into the small intestine to further digest and absorb nutrients. Understanding the mechanisms of gastric emptying and relationships between food and individuals is of paramount importance for the design and manufacture of novel and healthy foods. For ethical and cost reasons, in vivo tests are not always possible. In vitro digestion models therefore play a key role in current exploration of gastric emptying. This review outlines the mechanisms and physiology of gastric emptying, including calories, viscosity, composition of the food, age and gender of the individual. In addition, recent progress on in vitro static and dynamic gastric digestion models and future research trends are included in this review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available