4.8 Article

Performance and Validation of a Novel Biomarker-Based Stroke Risk Score for Atrial Fibrillation

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 134, Issue 22, Pages 1697-1707

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022802

Keywords

anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; models; cardiovascular; prevention and control; risk assessment; stroke

Funding

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co, Princeton, NJ
  4. Pfizer Inc, New York, NY

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased but variable risk of stroke. Our aim was to validate the recently developed biomarker-based ABC (age, biomarkers [high-sensitivity troponin and N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide], and clinical history of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack)-stroke risk score and compare its performance with the CHA(2)DS(2)VASc and ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) risk scores. METHODS: The ABC-stroke score includes age, biomarkers (N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin), and clinical history (prior stroke). This validation was based on 8356 patients, 16 137 person-years of follow-up, and 219 adjudicated stroke or systemic embolic events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY study (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). Levels of N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) were determined in plasma samples obtained at study entry. RESULTS: The ABC-stroke score was well calibrated with 0.76 stroke/systemic embolic events per 100 person-years in the predefined low (<1%/y) risk group, 1.48 in the medium (1%-2%/y) risk group, and 2.60 in the high (>2%/y) risk group for the ABC-stroke score with hs-cTnT. Hazard ratios for stroke/systemic embolic events were 1.95 for medium-versus low-risk groups, and 3.44 for high-versus low-risk groups. ABC-stroke score achieved C indices of 0.65 with both hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI, in comparison with 0.60 for CHA(2)DS(2)VASc (P=0.004 for hs-cTnT and P=0.022 hs-cTnI) and 0.61 for ATRIA scores (P=0.005 hs-cTnT and P=0.034 for hs-cTnI). CONCLUSIONS: The biomarker-based ABC-stroke score was well calibrated and consistently performed better than both the CHA(2)DS(2)VASc and ATRIA stroke scores. The ABC score should be considered an improved decision support tool in the care of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available