4.7 Article

An automatic method for weed mapping in oat fields based on UAV imagery

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105385

Keywords

UAV; Imagery classification; Weed mapping; Oats; Precision agriculture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accurate detection and treatment of weeds in agricultural fields is a necessary procedure for managing crop yield and avoiding herbicide pollution. With the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), the ability to acquire spatial data at the desired spatial and temporal resolution became available, and the resulting input data met high standards for weed management. In this paper, we tested four independent classification algorithms for the creation of weed maps, combining automatic and manual methods, as well as object-based and pixel-based classification approaches, which were used separately on two subsets. Input UAV data were collected using a low-cost RGB camera due to its affordability compared to multispectral cameras. Classification algorithms were based on the random forest machine learning algorithm for weed and bare soil extraction, following an unsupervised classification with the K-means algorithm for further estimation of weeds and bare soil presence in non-weed and non-soil areas. Of the four classification algorithms tested, the automatic object-based classification method achieved the highest classification accuracy, resulting in an overall accuracy of 89.0% for subset A and 87.1% for subset B. Automatic classification methods were robustly developed, using at least 0.25% of the scene size as the training data set in all circumstances anticipated for the random forest classification algorithm to operate. The use of the algorithm resulted in weed maps consisting of zoned classes and covering areas with similar biological properties, making them ready for use as inputs in weed treatments that use agricultural machinery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available