4.4 Article

Multi-Factor RFG-LSTM Algorithm for Stock Sequence Predicting

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 1041-1058

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-020-10008-2

Keywords

Long short-term memory; Rectified forgetting gate; Multi-factor model portfolio; Recurrent neural network

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [15ZDC024]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201806495014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a new method called RFG-LSTM, which reduces the dimensionality and complexity of a neural network by using a rectified forgetting gate while maintaining the ability to process sequenced data. In real trading scenarios of China's A stock market, the model objectively learns market characteristics and rules, contributing to the implementation of portfolio investment strategies.
As has been demonstrated, the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm has the special ability to process sequenced data; however, LSTM suffers from high dimensionality, and its structure is too complex, leading to overfitting. In this research, we propose a new method, RFG-LSTM, which uses a rectified forgetting gate (RFG) to restructure the LSTM. The rectified forgetting gate is a function that can limit the boundary of an input sequence, so it can reduce the dimensionality and complexity of a neural network. Through theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that RFG-LSTM is monotonic, just as LSTM is; additionally, the stringency does not change in the new algorithm. Thus, RFG-LSTM also has the ability to process sequenced data. Based on the real trading scenario of China's A stock market, we construct a multi-factor alpha portfolio with RFG-LSTM. The experimental results show that the RFG-LSTM model can objectively learn the characteristics and rules of the A stock market, and this can contribute to a portfolio investment strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available