4.7 Article

Hierarchical nest-like structure of Co/Fe MOF derived CoFe@C composite as wide-bandwidth microwave absorber

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105958

Keywords

CoFe-MOF-74; Nest-like structures; Microwave absorption properties; Wide effective absorbing bandwidth

Funding

  1. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shaanxi Province [2018JC-029]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772177]
  3. Science and Technology Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2018JQ5097]
  4. Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology [2017QNBJ04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) derived carbonaceous materials have attracted much interest as prospective microwave absorbers due to their porous structure, aperture adjustable, and topological diversity. Herein, a facile strategy was developed to regulate the morphology of CoFe-MOF-74 by adjusting the molar ratio of Co/Fe, and the hierarchical nest-like structure consisted of a large number of CoFe-MOF-74 nanorods was formed as the molar ratio of Co/Fe was 3:1. After pyrolysis at 800 degrees C in an argon atmosphere, porous CoFe@C nanorod-built hierarchical nest-like structures were obtained, which displayed superior microwave absorption performance with low filler loading of 10 wt%. The maximum reflection loss (RL) was -61.8 dB at 12.7 GHz with a thickness of 2.8 mm, and the corresponding effective absorbing bandwidth (RL < -10 dB) reached up to 9.2 GHz (8.8-18.0 GHz). The improved impedance matching, multi-scale pore structure, multiple reflections and scattering endowed by unique hierarchical nest-like structure, would contribute to the excellent microwave absorbing properties. Our research might provide a new direction to the fabrication of carbon-based absorber derived from MOFs with excellent microwave absorbing properties at low filler loading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available