4.6 Article

Endothelium modulates electrical field stimulation-induced contractions of Chelonoidis carbonaria aortic rings

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2020.108763

Keywords

Endothelium; Tetrodotoxin; Catecholamines

Funding

  1. CAPES fellowship
  2. FAPESP [2018/24971-9, 2016/09539-8, 2016/04731-8, 2017/151751]
  3. CNPq fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of endothelium in the electrical-field stimulation (EFS)-induced contractions of Chelonoidis carbonaria aorta was investigated. Contractions were evaluated in the presence and absence of L-NAME (100 mu M), tetrodotoxin (1 mu M), phentolamine (10 and 100 mu M), phenoxybenzamine (1 and 10 mu M), prazosin (100 mu M), idazoxan (100 mu M), atropine (10 mu M), D-tubocurarine (10 mu M) or indomethacin (10 mu M). EFS-induced contraction was also carried out in endothelium-denuded rings. EFS-induced contraction was investigated by the sandwich assay. Concentration curves to endothelin-1 (0.1-100 nM) and U46619 (0.001-100 mu M) were also constructed to calculate both Emax and EC50. EFS at 16 Hz contracted Chelonoidis aorta, which was almost abolished by the endothelium removal. The addition of L-NAME increased the EFS response (2.0 +/- 0.4 and 8.3 +/- 1.9 mN). In L-NAME treated aortic rings, tetrodotoxin did not change the EFS-response (5.1 +/- 1.8 and 4.9 +/- 1.7 mN). Indomethacin, atropine and d-tubucurarine also did not affect the EFS-response. Phentolamine at 10 mu M did not change the EFS-induced contraction; however, at 100 mu M, reduced it (3.9 +/- 1 and 1.9 +/- 0.3 mN). Prazosin and idazoxan did not change EFS-induced contractions. Phenoxybenzamine at 1 reduced by 76% (9.6 +/- 3.4 and 2.3 +/- 0.8 mN) and at 10 mu M by 90% the EFS response. Immunohistochemistry identified tyrosine hydroxylase in the endothelium and brain, whereas S100 protein was found only in brain. In conclusion, endothelium modulates EFS-induced contractions in Chelonoidis aortic rings and this modulation may be due to endothelium-derived catecholamines, possibly dopamine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available