4.4 Review

The effectiveness of conservative interventions for the management of syndromic hypermobility: a systematic literature review

Journal

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 1113-1129

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05284-0

Keywords

Conservative treatment; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; Hypermobility; Systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Syndromic hypermobility disorders, such as hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, are characterized by excessive joint range of motion and pain. Conservative management, primarily through exercise, has shown some improvements in symptoms but there is weak evidence of its superiority over other treatments. More robust randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of whole-body conservative management.
Introduction 'Syndromic hypermobility' encompasses heritable connective tissue disorders such as hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders which are characterised by excessive joint range of motion and pain. Conservative interventions such as exercise are the cornerstone of management, yet their effectiveness is unclear. Aim To systematically appraise the effectiveness of conservative management for people with syndromic hypermobility. Method A systematic online database search was conducted (AMED, BND, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsychINFO and SportDiscus). Potential articles were assessed for eligibility by two researchers against the following criteria: adults and children with a hEDS/HSD diagnosis (or equivalent diagnosis using specific criteria); non-pharmacological or non-surgical interventions; outcomes related to pain, physical function, psychological well-being or quality of life. Controlled trials and cohort studies were included. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists were used to assess methodological quality. Results Eleven studies were included, comprising eight controlled trials and three cohort studies. All studies investigated interventions that had exercise as the primary component. Three small controlled studies demonstrated superior effects of conservative management relative to a control group. However, those studies only focused on a single area of the body, only recruited women, and had no long-term follow-up. All studies reported improvements in a wide range of outcomes over time. Conclusion Controlled trial evidence for the superiority of conservative management over comparators is weak. There is some evidence that people improve over time. Robust randomised controlled trial research of the long-term effectiveness of 'whole-body' (rather than individual joints or body areas) conservative management is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available