4.5 Article

Sleep problems worsen health-related quality of life and participation during the first 12 months of stroke rehabilitation

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 1400-1408

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215520935940

Keywords

Sleep wake disorders; stroke; rehabilitation; physical therapy modalities

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Evaluate the impact of self-reported sleep problems on post-stroke recovery. Design: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of longitudinal data from the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) rehabilitation and recovery study (phase-III single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial). Group medians were compared for three sleep problem groups across three time points. Setting: Outpatient and in-home physical therapy. Subjects: Adults during the first year following stroke (n = 408, 380, 360 at 2, 6, 12 months, respectively). Interventions: The original study compared effects of locomotor training with body weight support in the year post-stroke. This analysis evaluated function in three sleep/functional-impact groups: no sleep problems, sleep problems with no-to-minimal-impact and sleep problems with moderate-to-quite-a-bit of impact. Main measures: Participants' responses regarding if they had a sleep problem, such as insomnia and, if so, what the impact was on their function. Stroke Impact Scale subscales for strength, hand function, mobility, ADLs, memory, communication, emotion, participation, and percent recovery. Results: About 25% of people with stroke reported sleep difficulty, 10% perceived sleep problems negatively impact function. Groups self-reporting worse sleep performed worse in all functional subscales (except self-perceived percent recovery) during the first year post-stroke. Conclusion: Self-reported poor sleep adversely effects post-stroke functional recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available