4.7 Article

Long-term effects of folic acid and vitamin-B12 supplementation on fracture risk and cardiovascular disease: Extended follow-up of the B-PROOF trial

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 1199-1206

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.033

Keywords

B-vitamins; Fracture; Cardiovascular disease; Long-term follow-up

Funding

  1. The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Hague [6130.0031]
  2. NZO, Zoetermeer
  3. Orthica, Almere
  4. NCHA (Netherlands Consortium Healthy Ageing) Leiden/Rotterdam
  5. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, the Hague [KB-15-004-003]
  6. Wageningen University, Wageningen
  7. VUmc,Amsterdam
  8. Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that folic acid and vitamin-B12 supplementation had no significant effect on fracture risk or cardiovascular disease risk in older individuals over a longer follow-up period. However, it may be beneficial in reducing fractures in individuals with high total homocysteine concentrations, a finding that requires further replication.
Background & aims: In the initial B-proof, we found inconsistent results of B vitamin supplementation. However, the debate regarding the effects of B vitamins on age-related diseases continues. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the long-term effects (5-7 years follow-up) of an intervention with folic acid and vitamin-B12 supplementation on fracture and cardiovascular disease risk. Methods: Extended follow-up of the B-PROOF trial, a multi-center, double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial designed to assess the effect of 2-3 years daily supplementation with folic acid (400 mg) and vitamin-B12 (500 mg) versus placebo (n = 2,919). Primary outcome was verified self reported fracture incidence and secondary outcomes were self-reported cardiovascular endpoints, which were collected through a follow-up questionnaires Proportional hazard analyses was used for the effect of the intervention on risk of fracture(s) and logistic regression for the effect of the intervention on risk of cardiovascular disease. Results: A total of 1,298 individuals (4 4.5%) participated in the second follow-up round with median of 54 months [51-58], (n = 662 and n = 636, treatment versus placebo group). Median age at baseline was 71.0 years [68.0-76.0] for both groups. No effect was observed of the intervention on osteoporotic fracture or any fracture risk after a follow-up (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.62-1.59 and HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50-1.19, respectively), nor on cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease risk (OR: 1.05; 95%CI: 0.80-1.44 and OR: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.50-1.45, respectively). Potential interaction by baseline homocysteine concentration was observed for osteoporotic-and any fracture (p = 0.10 and 0.06 respectively), which indicated a significantly lower risk of any fracture in the treatment group with higher total homocysteine concentrations (>15.1 mmol/l). No age-dependent effects were present. Conclusions: This study supports and extends previous null -findings of the B-PROOF trial and shows that supplementation of folic acid and vitamin-B12 has no effect on fracture risk, nor on cardiovascular disease in older individuals over a longer follow-up period. However, B-vitamin supplementation may be beneficial in reducing fractures in individuals with high total homocysteine concentrations, a finding which needs to be replicated. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available