4.7 Article

Clinical Effectiveness of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Based Antiretroviral Regimens Among Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Collaboration of Cohort Studies in the United States and Canada

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 73, Issue 7, Pages E1408-E1414

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1037

Keywords

integrase strand transfer inhibitors; treatment-naive adults with HIV; trial emulation; efavirenz; antiretroviral therapy

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01AI069918, F31AI124794, F31DA037788, G12MD007583, K01AI093197, K01AI131895, K23EY013707, K24AI065298, K24AI118591, K24DA000432, KL2TR000421, N01CP01004, N02CP055504, N02CP91027, P30AI027757, P30AI027763, UL1TR000083, U01AI068634, U24AA020794, U01AI038855, U01AI038858]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [CDC-200-2006-18797, CDC-200-2015-63931]
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration [90047713]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [90051652, CBR-86906, CBR-94036, HCP-97105, TGF-96118]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC-200-2006-18797, CDC-200-2015-63931]
  6. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
  7. Government of Alberta, Canada
  8. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  9. National Cancer Institute
  10. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  11. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  12. National Human Genome Research Institute
  13. National Institute for Mental Health
  14. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  15. National Institute on Aging
  16. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  17. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  18. National Institute of Nursing Research
  19. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  20. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  21. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  22. ViiV Healthcare
  23. Emory University Center for AIDS Research [AI050409]
  24. The National Institutes of Health [U01DA036935, U10EY008057, U10EY008052, U10EY008067, U01HL146192, U01HL146193, U01HL146194, U01HL146201, U01HL146202, U01HL146203, U01HL146204, U01HL146205, U01HL146208, U01HL146240, U01HL146241, U01HL146242, U01HL146245, U01HL146333, UL1RR024131, UL1TR000004, U01AA020790]
  25. A National Institutes of Health [U01AA013566, P30AI027767, P30AI036219, P30AI050409, P30AI050410, P30AI094189, P30AI110527, P30MH62246, R01AA016893, R01AI157758, U01AI068636, U01AI069432, U01AI069434, U01DA03629, R01DA011602, R01DA012568, R01 AG053100, R24AI067039, Z01CP010214, K01AI125087, U54MD007587]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that InSTI-based and EFV-based initial ART regimens had similar 6-year composite clinical outcomes, highlighting the substantial risk of adverse clinical outcomes even when initiating modern ART.
Background. Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens are now recommended as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for adults with human immunodeficiency virus, but evidence on long-term clinical effectiveness of InSTI-based regimens remains limited. We examined whether InSTI-based regimens improved longer-term clinical outcomes. Methods. We included participants from clinical cohorts in the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design who initiated their first ART regimen, containing either InSTI (ie, raltegravir, dolutegravir, and elvitegravir-cobicistat) or efavirenz (EFV) as an active comparator, between 2009 and 2016. We estimated observational analogs of 6-year intention-to-treat and per-protocol risks, risk differences (RDs), and hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite outcome of AIDS, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, end-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, or death. Results. Of 15 993 participants, 5824 (36%) initiated an InSTI-based and 10 169 (64%) initiated an EFV-based regimen. During the 6-year follow-up, 440 in the InSTI group and 1097 in the EFV group incurred the composite outcome. The estimated 6-year intention-to-treat risks were 14.6% and 14.3% for the InSTI and EFV groups, respectively, corresponding to a RD of 0.3% (95% confidence interval, -2.7% to 3.3%) and a HR of 1.08 (.97-1.19); the estimated 6-year per-protocol risks were 12.2% for the InSTI group and 11.9% for the EFV group, corresponding to a RD of 0.3% (-3.0% to 3.7%) and a HR of 1.09 (.96-1.25). Conclusions. InSTI- and EFV-based initial ART regimens had similar 6-year composite clinical outcomes. The risk of adverse clinical outcomes remains substantial even when initiating modern ART.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available