4.3 Review

Accuracy of MRI-guided Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Patients Under Active Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 3-+

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.06.008

Keywords

Diagnosis; Prostate cancer; Systematic biopsy; Target biopsy; Upgrading

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis compared the accuracy of upgrading to clinically significant prostate cancer between MRI-TB and SB in low-risk PCa patients in active surveillance. The results showed that MRI-TB had better performance compared to SB. Therefore, using MRI-TB alone may be preferable in patients with low-risk PCa in active surveillance.
This meta-analysis focuses on the accuracy of upgrading to clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) by multi parametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) versus systematic biopsy (SB). We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciencias da Saude databases through January 2020 for comparative, retrospective/prospective, paired-cohort, and randomized clinical trials with paired comparisons. The population consisted of patients with low risk PCa in active surveillance with at least 1 index lesion on imaging. We evaluated the quality of evidence by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 score. Group comparisons considered the differences between the area under the curve summary receiver operating characteristic curve in a 2-tailed method. We also compared the positive predictive value of the best single method (MRI-TB or SB) and the referral study test (combined biopsy, a combination of MRI-TB and SB). The meta-analysis included 6 studies enrolling 741 patients. The pooled sensitivity for the 2 groups was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.83; I-2 = 75%) and 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.74; I-2 = 55.4%), respectively. The area under the curve for the MRI-TB and SB groups were 0.99 and 0.92 (P < .001), respectively. The positive predictive value for the MRI-TB and combined biopsy groups were similar. The accumulated evidence suggests better results for MRI-TB compared with SB. Therefore, use of MRI-TB alone may be preferable in patients in active surveillance harboring low-risk PCa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available