4.7 Review

Designing Evolutionary-based Interception Strategies to Block the Transition from Precursor Phases to Multiple Myeloma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 15-23

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1395

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. MMRF
  2. Perelman Foundation
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center NCI Core grant [P30 CA 008748]
  4. American Society of Hematology
  5. International Myeloma Foundation
  6. Society of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  7. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancements in next-generation sequencing technology have allowed for a better understanding of the genetic landscape of multiple myeloma, including drivers and evolutionary processes. This new knowledge can be utilized in clinical settings to improve therapeutic interventions at various disease stages.
The development of next-generation sequencing technology has dramatically improved our understanding of the genetic landscape of multiple myeloma. Several new drivers and recurrent events have been reported and linked to a potential driver role. This complex landscape is enhanced by intraclonal mutational heterogeneity and variability introduced through the dimensions of time and space. The evolutionary history of multiple myeloma is driven by both the accumulation of different genomic drivers and by the activity of different mutational processes active overtime. In this review, we describe how these new findings and sequencing technologies have been progressively allowed to understand and reshape our knowledge of the complexity of multiple myeloma at each of its developmental stages: premalignant, at diagnosis, and in relapsed/ refractory states. We discuss how these evolutionary concepts can be utilized in the clinic to alter evolutionary trajectories providing a framework for therapeutic intervention at early-disease stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available