4.1 Article

In-vitro bioaccessibility of antioxidant properties of bee pollen in Turkey

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 133-141

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA CIENCIA TECNOLOGIA ALIMENTOS
DOI: 10.1590/fst.10220

Keywords

bee pollen; antioxidant capacity; phenolics; bioaccessibility; functional food

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine the physicochemical properties, total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, and bioaccessibility of 20 bee pollen samples sold in Turkey. Results showed that bee pollen samples had high total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, with varying levels of bioaccessibility. Unpackaged bee pollen had lower antioxidant capacity and bioaccessibility compared to trademarked products.
The study aims to determine certain physicochemical properties (moisture, ash, titratable acidity, pH, and color), total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC, ABTS, DPPH) and bioaccessibility of 20 bee pollen samples (10 unpackaged and 10 trademarked products in their original packages) sold in Turkey. The total phenolic content of the bee pollen samples was detected as 147.10-462.02 mg GAE/g and bioaccessibility ranged from 36.91% to 77.87%. The highest total value for antioxidant capacity was assessed as 83.24-257.27 ?mol TE/g by the CUPRAC method. When the bioaccessibility of the antioxidant capacity of bee pollen was compared among the methods, the highest value (95.76%) was obtained for the sample M by the CUPRAC method. Antioxidant capacity and bioaccessibility of the unpackaged bee pollen samples were lower than those of the trademarked products. Based on overall evaluations, it can be deduced that bee pollen known for its potential beneficial effects on health may well be used as a functional food additive in the production of various food products with its high antioxidant and bioaccessibility features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available