4.5 Article

Revisiting black hole thermodynamics in massive gravity: charged particle absorption and infalling shell of dust*

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS C
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/abab8a

Keywords

black hole thermodynamics; weak cosmic censorship; particle absorption

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [11705161, 11675139, 11875220]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170481]
  3. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [171006]
  4. Postgraduate Reaearch AMP
  5. Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX19_2098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we apply two methods to consider the variation of massive black holes in both normal and extended thermodynamic phase spaces. The first method considers a charged particle being absorbed by the black hole, whereas the second considers a shell of dust falling into it. With the former method, the first and second laws of thermodynamics are always satisfied in the normal phase space; however, in the extended phase space, the first law is satisfied but the validity of the second law of thermodynamics depends upon the model parameters. With the latter method, both laws are valid. We argue that the former method's violation of the second law of thermodynamics may be attributable to the assumption that the change of internal energy of the black hole is equal to the energy of the particle. Finally, we demonstrate that the event horizon always ensures the validity of weak cosmic censorship in both phase spaces; this means that the violation of the second law of thermodynamics, arising under the aforementioned assumption, does not affect the weak cosmic censorship conjecture. This further supports our argument that the assumption in the first method is responsible for the violation and requires deeper treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available