4.7 Article

Study on ozonolysis of asymmetric alkenes with matrix isolation and FT-IR spectroscopy

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126413

Keywords

O-3; Matrix isolation; Criegee intermediate; Ozonolysis reaction; 2-Methyl-1-butene; 2-Methyl-2-butene

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0202202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571130022, 21806169]
  3. Beijing Nova Program [2018113]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2017042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

O-3 and alkenes are important reactants in the formation of SOA in the atmosphere. The intermediates and reaction mechanism of ozonation of alkene is an important topic in atmospheric chemistry. In this study, the low-temperature matrix isolation was used to capture the intermediates such as Primary ozonides (POZs), Criegee Intermediates (CIs), and Secondary ozonides (SOZs) generated from ozonation of 2-methyl-1-butene (2M1B) and 2-methyl-2-butene (2M2B). The results have been identified by the vacuum infrared spectroscopy and theoretical calculation. Our results show that during the ozonation of asymmetric alkenes, two kinds of CIs and more than two kinds of SOZs were generated due to the different decomposition modes of POZs. The infrared absorption peaks of (CH3)(2)COO and CH3CH2C(CH3)OO for O-O telescopic vibration was determined to be 889 cm(-1) and 913 cm(-1), respectively. Using the merged jet method, it was found that a large amount of HCHO was produced during the ozonation of 2M1B, and glyoxal and methylglyoxal were produced in the ozonation of 2M2B. Our findings highlight the importance of asymmetric alkene ozonolysis reactions in producing CIs, further improving the understanding of the generation of CIs from ozonation of alkenes. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available