4.5 Article

Interference of a magnetic field generated by circular magnets in the retention of chromium by microbial cells and in the morphology of a mixed culture during the bio-removal of chromium from effluent

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2020.108019

Keywords

Magnetic field; Mixed culture; Chromium removal; Microbial cells; Cell rupture

Funding

  1. Federal University of Uberlandia, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Multiuser Laboratory of Microscopy of the Faculty of Chemical Engineering of the Federal University of Uberlandia
  2. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES)
  3. Foundation of Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) [APQ-01407-13]
  4. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  5. Sao Paulo Research Support Foundation (FAPESP) [FAPESP 05871-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A magnetic field of 5 Hz and magnetic field intensities of 15.9 and 57.8 m T, generated by 40 circular magnets, was investigated with the objective of influencing mixed culture in the removal of chromium and total organic carbon (TOC) from an effluent contaminated with Cr(VI) and verifying the effects on mixed culture morphology and the retention of chromium by microbial cells during the treatment process. For the magnetic field time of 7 h and 48 min, the removal of Cr(VI), total Cr, and TOC corresponded to 99.97 +/- 0.01, 74.2 +/- 1.2, and 25.1 +/- 1.5 %, respectively. This was higher than results obtained when the bioreactor was operated without a magnetic field for the evaluated time. The amount of chromium retained in the cells by the experiments with and without magnetic fields was 0.59 and 0.53 %, respectively, justifying one of the mechanisms that increase the removal. The morphology of the mixed culture did not show changes in the images from scanning electron microscopy with the presence of chromium or the magnetic field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available