4.7 Article

Wear and microhardness behaviors of AA7075/SiC-BN hybrid nanocomposite surfaces fabricated by friction stir processing

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 16938-16943

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.274

Keywords

Hybrid; Nanocomposite; FSP; Wear; Microhardness

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [G: 274-135-1440]
  2. DSR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wear resistance and microhardness behavior of hybrids consisting of wrought aluminum alloy AA7075 with different volume fractions of SiC and BN nano-powders were investigated experimentally. The surfaces of the hybrid nanocomposites were fabricated by friction stir processing (FSP). The microstructure of the reinforcement nano-powders and fabricated nanocomposite surface were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-resolution polarized optical microscopy. The wear resistance and microhardness tests were performed on the specimens before and after the fabrication process. The AA7075 showed a large grain size with an average of 178 mu m, while the hybrid composites of AA7075/SiC-BN showed finer grains with an average size of 8 mu m due to the FSP parameters. Additionally, a good nano-particle surface dispersion was clearly visible with nearly no voids. The wear resistance results showed that the addition of SiC and BN nano-particles increased the fabricated nanocomposite surface wear resistance by 53-61%. It was also noted that the wear resistance rate had a clearly inverse relationship with the increasing mass fraction of the nano-particles. The presence of SiC and BN nano-particles also increased the hardness by an average of 45%. The volume fraction of the reinforced nanoparticles had a significant impact on the mechanical and wear properties of the fabricated hybrid nanocomposite surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available