4.7 Article

Experimental study and mechanism analysis of permeability sensitivity of mechanically damaged concrete to confining pressure

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106073

Keywords

Mechanically damaged concrete; Pore structure; Permeability; Confining pressure; Sensitivity

Funding

  1. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation Youth Project [1908085QE185]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642502]
  3. Anhui Provincial College of Natural Science Research Key Project [KJ2018A0098]
  4. Science Research Foundation for Young Teachers in Anhui University of Science and Technology [QN2017211]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674006]
  6. National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [201910361023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally examined variations in the permeability of mechanically damaged concrete under the application and relaxation of confining pressure and investigated the mechanism of the variation from the perspective of pore structure. The results showed that mechanical damage significantly altered the pore structure of concrete specimens, and as a result of micro-cracking the porosity increases above 0.1 micro metre in size. During the loading phase, the permeability gradually decreased with increasing confining pressure, the plot of which could be divided into three segments-sensitive, transition, and insensitive segments. In the unloading phase, the permeability was gradually recovered with the relaxation of the confining pressure. Permeability values during the relaxation were lower than those during pressure application. This is related to the partial opening of microcracking and pore, while the deformed microcracking and pore cannot be fully recovered. The confining pressure changes the pore structure dominated by mesopores into micropores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available