4.7 Article

Distinct Regulatory Programs Control the Latent Regenerative Potential of Dermal Fibroblasts during Wound Healing

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 396-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.07.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-106646, PJT-401394, PJT-148816, FDN-159908]
  2. Calgary Firefighters Burn Treatment Society
  3. UCVM Dean's Excellence Award
  4. CIHR Vanier doctoral scholarship
  5. Alberta Innovates (AI) doctoral scholarship
  6. Killam doctoral scholarship
  7. Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute postdoctoral fellowships
  8. AI MD/PhD scholarship
  9. CIHR master's scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dermal fibroblasts exhibit considerable heterogeneity during homeostasis and in response to injury. Defining lineage origins of reparative fibroblasts and regulatory programs that drive fibrosis or, conversely, promote regeneration will be essential for improving healing outcomes. Using complementary fate-mapping approaches, we show that hair follicle mesenchymal progenitors make limited contributions to wound repair. In contrast, extrafollicular progenitors marked by the quiescence-associated factor Hic1 generated the bulk of reparative fibroblasts and exhibited functional divergence, mediating regeneration in the center of the wound neodermis and scar formation in the periphery. Single-cell RNA-seq revealed unique transcriptional, regulatory, and epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk signatures that enabled mesenchymal competence for regeneration. Integration with scATAC-seq highlighted changes in chromatin accessibility within regeneration-associated loci. Finally, pharmacological modulation of RUNX1 and retinoic acid signaling or genetic deletion of Hic1 within wound-activated fibroblasts was sufficient to modulate healing outcomes, suggesting that reparative fibroblasts have latent but modifiable regenerative capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available