4.8 Article

A Universal Gut-Microbiome-Derived Signature Predicts Cirrhosis

Journal

CELL METABOLISM
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 878-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P42ES010337]
  2. NIH [HL088093, DK057978, HL105278, ES010337]
  3. Cancer Center [CA014195]
  4. NOMIS Foundation Distinguished Scientist and Scholar award
  5. Fondation Leducq
  6. NIEHS [5P42ES010337]
  7. NCATS [5UL1TR001442]
  8. NIDDK [U01DK061734, R01DK106419, P30DK120515, R01DK121378]
  9. NHLBI [P01HL147835]
  10. DOD PRCRP [W81XWH-18-2-0026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysregulation of the gut microbiome has been implicated in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. To determine the diagnostic capacity of this association, we compared stool microbiomes across 163 well-characterized participants encompassing non-NAFLD controls, NAFLD-cirrhosis patients, and their first-degree relatives. Interrogation of shotgun metagenomic and untargeted metabolomic profiles by using the random forest machine learning algorithm and differential abundance analysis identified discrete metagenomic and metabolomic signatures that were similarly effective in detecting cirrhosis (diagnostic accuracy 0.91, area under curve [AUC]). Combining the metagenomic signature with age and serum albumin levels accurately distinguished cirrhosis in etiologically and genetically distinct cohorts from geographically separated regions. Additional inclusion of serum aspartate aminotransferase levels, which are increased in cirrhosis patients, enabled discrimination of cirrhosis from earlier stages of fibrosis. These findings demonstrate that a core set of gut microbiome species might offer universal utility as a non-invasive diagnostic test for cirrhosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available