4.3 Review

Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in cardiology on the verge of the decade

Journal

CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 460-472

Publisher

VIA MEDICA
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0093

Keywords

machine learning; artificial intelligence; cardiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial intelligence (AI) is considered the fourth industrial revolution, with rapid advancements in its applications in medicine promising more precise diagnoses, streamlined workflows, and increased accessibility to healthcare services. Despite the popularity of AI technologies, many healthcare practitioners still lack a comprehensive understanding of AI methods and potential risks.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been hailed as the fourth industrial revolution and its influence on people's lives is increasing. The research on AI applications in medicine is progressing rapidly. This revolution shows promise for more precise diagnoses, streamlined workflows, increased accessibility to healthcare services and new insights into ever-growing population-wide datasets. While some applications have already found their way into contemporary patient care, we are still in the early days of the AI-era in medicine. Despite the popularity of these new technologies, many practitioners lack an understanding of AI methods, their benefits, and pitfalls. This review aims to provide information about the general concepts of machine learning (ML) with special focus on the applications of such techniques in cardiovascular medicine. It also sets out the current trends in research related to medical applications of AI. Along with new possibilities, new threats arise - acknowledging and understanding them is as important as understanding the ML methodology itself. Therefore, attention is also paid to the current opinions and guidelines regarding the validation and safety of AI-powered tools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available