4.8 Article

Nitrogen-rich holey graphene for efficient oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

CARBON
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 66-73

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.110

Keywords

N-doped holey graphene; Edge N; Oxygen functionality; Exfoliation; Oxygen reduction reaction

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206500]
  2. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51732002]
  3. Distinguished Scientist Program at BUCT [buctylkxj02]
  4. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, BUCT
  5. CWRU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N)-doped porous carbon materials have attracted tremendous attention as low-cost and highly-efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). In this study, holey graphene with a high edge pyridinic N-doping (43.0% in 5.1 at.% N, N-hG) has been prepared via a modified two-step synthetic method, involving the annealing in air at 430 degrees C to create holes, followed by N-doping in Ar/NH3 atmosphere at 850 degrees C. The resultant N-hG was demonstrated to possess a high specific surface area (1170.05 m(2) g(-1)), outstanding ORR performance (E-1/2 = 0.833 V, E-onset = 0.91 V) close to those of Pt/C catalyst in alkaline electrolyte, and a better long-term stability and methanol tolerance than Pt/C. The outstanding performance was attributed to the high specific surface area with abundant exposed active sites as well as the high edge N-content and large number of holes rich with the edge defects to ensure high catalytic activities. Furthermore, a mechanistic understanding of the hole formation in graphene lattice and subsequent edge N-doping was obtained, which could be used to guide the design and development of various new low-cost, highly efficient carbon electrocatalysts for ORR and beyond. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available