4.7 Article

Binding affinity of family 4 carbohydrate binding module on cellulose films of nanocrystals and nanofibrils

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116725

Keywords

Cellulose nanocrystal; Cellulose nanofibril; Carbohydrate binding module; Quartz crystal microbalance; Binding mechanism; Thermodynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730106, 31770623]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Universities [17KJA530005]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CBM4 binds preferentially to both CNF and CNC, with different driving forces: hydrogen bonds for CNF resulting in favorable enthalpy but compensated by unfavorable entropy change, while favorable entropy for CNC but compensated by unfavorable enthalpic change due to water rearrangement.
The binding affinity and thermodynamics of family 4 carbohydrate-binding module (CBM4), belonging to type B CBM, on model surfaces of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and nanofibrils (CNF) were investigated by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) technology in real-time at different temperatures. The thermodynamic parameters associated with the interaction, such as Gibbs free energy, enthalpy change, entropy change and heat capacity were obtained using the van't Hoff analysis via a nonlinear parameter estimation. The results demonstrated CBM4 binds preferentially to both CNF and CNC, whereas the driving forces behind them were very different. The former was related to the hydrogen bonds formed in the CBM4 clefts, resulting in a favorable enthalpy but compensated by unfavorable entropy change; on the contrary, the latter was mainly driven by favorable entropy but compensated by unfavorable enthalpic change due to water rearrangement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available