4.5 Article

Relapse-related molecular signature in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas based on base excision repair, stimulator of interferon genes pathway and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages 3493-3502

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.14570

Keywords

BER; lung adenocarcinoma; nomogram; predictive; recurrence; STING; TIL

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science,CN [NSFC 81772495]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Approximately 30% of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relapse within 5 years after surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to identify a robust and reliable prognostic signature for early-stage NSCLC. Immunohistochemistry data from 147 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma (stage I-LUAD) were analyzed for the protein expression of base excision repair (BER), stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to explore the relationship between protein expression and prognosis. A prediction model was further established by nomogram and externally verified using The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. XRCC1 and H2AX are negative prognostic markers for relapse-free survival (RFS), while CD8, CD20 and STING are positive prognostic markers for RFS. Nomograms for RFS share common prognostic markers, including XRCC1, H2AX, STING, CD8 and CD20. The c-index was 0.724 and 0.698 in the training cohort and the internal validation cohort, respectively. It was externally verified that the nomogram model had a good prediction for recurrence of stage I-LUAD. Correlation analysis showed that APE1 and H2AX were negatively correlated with STING, while STING was positively correlated with TIL. BER, the STING pathway and TIL were associated with early recurrence and were correlated with the tissue expression of stage I-LUAD. Our nomogram model was a good predictor for recurrence of stage I-LUAD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available