4.0 Article

On variable ordination of Cholesky-based estimation for a sparse covariance matrix

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11564

Keywords

Covariance matrix; high dimensionality; order of variables; sparsity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [20YJC910007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71903090]
  3. Science Education Foundation of Liaoning Province [LN2019Q21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article explores methods for estimating large sparse covariance matrices and proposes a new approach to address the issue of variable order, ensuring positive definiteness of the estimator while capturing the sparse structure of the covariance matrix. The merits of the method are demonstrated through simulation studies and a practical example.
Estimation of a large sparse covariance matrix is of great importance for statistical analysis, especially in high-dimensional settings. The traditional approach such as the sample covariance matrix performs poorly due to the high dimensionality. The modified Cholesky decomposition (MCD) is a commonly used method for sparse covariance matrix estimation. However, the MCD method relies on the order of variables, which often is not available or cannot be pre-determined in practice. In this work, we solve this order issue by obtaining a set of covariance matrix estimates based on assuming different orders of variables used in the MCD. Then we consider an ensemble estimator as the centre of such a set of covariance matrix estimates with respect to the Frobenius norm. Our proposed method not only ensures that the estimator is positive definite, but also captures the underlying sparse structure of the covariance matrix. Under some regularity conditions, we establish both algorithmic and asymptotic convergence of the proposed method. Its merits are illustrated via simulation studies and a practical example using data from a prostate cancer study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available