4.2 Article

Patient-level Characteristics and Inequitable Access to Inpatient Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression: A Population-based Cross-sectional Study: Caracteristiques au niveau du patient et acces inequitable a la therapie electroconvulsive pour patients hospitalises

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0706743720935647

Keywords

electroconvulsive therapy; major depressive disorder; bipolar disorder; observational study; regression analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. ICES - Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)
  2. University of Toronto Department of Psychiatry Clinician Scientist Program Norris Scholar Award
  3. Canadian Institute for Health Research Fellowship Award
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  5. National Institutes of Health-US (NIH)
  6. Weston Brain Institute
  7. Brain Canada
  8. Temerty Family through the CAMH Foundation
  9. Campbell Research Institute
  10. Brainsway Ltd.
  11. Canada Research Chair in Drug Policy Research Evaluation
  12. Brainsway Inc
  13. Magventure Inc.
  14. National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH)
  15. Temerty Family
  16. Grant Family
  17. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Foundation
  18. Campbell Institute
  19. New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  20. Department of Anesthesia at the University of Toronto
  21. Endowed Chair in Translational Anesthesiology Research at St. Michael's Hospital
  22. University of Toronto
  23. Women's College Hospital
  24. University of Toronto Department of Psychiatry
  25. Canadian Institutes for Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factors such as age, marital status, education level, neighborhood income, and illness polarity are associated with the likelihood of receiving inpatient electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for depression. Many clinical factors regarding the receipt of inpatient ECT are in line with clinical guidelines, but nonclinical factors impacting its use should be further investigated for equitable access to ECT.
Objective: A variety of patient characteristics drive the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in depression. However, the extent to which each characteristic influences the receipt of ECT, and whether they are appropriate, is unknown. The aim of this study is to identify patient-level characteristics associated with receiving inpatient ECT for depression. Method: We identified all psychiatric inpatients with a major depressive episode admitted to hospital >= 3 days in Ontario, Canada (2009 to 2017). The association between patient-level characteristics at admission and receipt of inpatient ECT was determined using logistic regression, where a generalized estimating equations approach accounted for repeat admissions. Results: The cohort included 53,174 inpatients experiencing 75,429 admissions, with 6,899 admissions involving ECT (9.2%). Among demographic factors, age was most associated with ECT-younger adults had reduced (OR = 0.30, 95%CI, 0.24 to 0.37; 18 to 25 years) while older adults had increased (OR = 3.08, 95%CI, 2.41 to 3.93; 85+ years) odds compared to middle-aged adults (46 to 55 years). The likelihood of ECT was greater for individuals who were married/partnered, had postsecondary education, and resided in the highest neighborhood income quintile. Among clinical factors, illness polarity was most associated with receiving ECT-bipolar depression had reduced odds of receiving ECT (OR = 0.62, 95%CI, 0.57 to 0.69) The likelihood of receiving ECT was greater in psychotic depression, more depressive symptoms, and incapable to consent to treatment and was reduced with comorbid substance use disorders and several medical comorbidities. Conclusions: Nearly 1 in 10 admissions for depression in Ontario, Canada, involve ECT. Many clinical factors associated with receiving inpatient ECT were concordant with clinical guidelines; however, nonclinical factors associated with its use warrant investigation of their impact on equitable access to ECT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available