4.5 Article

Prospective identification and causality evaluation of suspected adverse drug reactions in neonates

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages 1541-1546

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14485

Keywords

adverse drug reactions; clinical pharmacology; neonatology; paediatrics; pharmacovigilance

Funding

  1. University of Liverpool
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neonates experience high rates of underreported adverse drug reactions, with current causality assessment tools in need of improvement.
Neonates experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but under-reporting of suspected ADRs to national spontaneous reporting schemes in this population is particularly high. A prospective observational study collected suspected neonatal ADRs at a tertiary neonatal unit. Cases were analysed for causality by six assessors using three existing methods. Sixty-three suspected ADR cases were identified in 35/193 neonates (18.1%). The proportion of suspected ADRs where the drug was prescribed off-label was 30/68 (44.1%). When 34 cases were assessed for causality using three methods, global kappa scores of less than 0.3 for each tool suggested only fair inter-rater reliability. Neonatal ADRs can be captured and occur from a variety of drugs affecting many organ systems. The current tools for assessing causality need to be adapted before they can reliably assess neonatal ADRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available