4.4 Article

Psychological predictors of functional outcomes in service members with traumatic brain injury

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages 1183-1192

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1793387

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; functional outcome; posttraumatic stress disorder; psychological functioning; military

Funding

  1. DHA Contracting Office (CO-NCR) [HT0014-19-C-0004, HT0014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary Objective Research is increasingly demonstrating the significant impact that non-medical factors can have on outcomes of service members (SMs) with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Thus, the current study examined which demographic, TBI-related factors, and psychological variables are most predictive of functional outcomes. Research Design Retrospective database analysis from medical chart review. Methods and Procedures One hundred forty-one patients who received rehabilitation services at an outpatient TBI military treatment facility between 2013 and 2018. Data collected included demographic variables, time since injury, neuropsychological measures, psychological diagnoses, Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scores, and Walter Reed Functional Impairment Scale (FIS). Hierarchical linear regression models were used to predict functional outcomes (measured by FIS total, work, social functioning scales). Main Outcomes and Results Results indicated that comorbid PTSD diagnosis and PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) score were predictive of total functional, work, and social outcomes, over and above demographic and TBI-related factors. Conclusions Current findings confirmed the importance of evaluating and treating psychological factors, as well as exploring one's responding style (NIM), when managing chronic mTBI in SMs. Given ongoing findings of psychological underpinnings to mTBI outcome, there is further need to focus on early interventions to optimize psychological and functional outcomes for SMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available