4.8 Article

Comparison of microbial communities during anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste: Effect of substrate sources and temperatures

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124016

Keywords

Kitchen waste; Anaerobic digestion; Microbial community; Sources; Temperature

Funding

  1. Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ISEE2020YB04]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA13040102]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A0303130335, 2015A030310413]
  4. Training Program for Excellent Young Teachers in Guangdong Universities [YQ2015125]
  5. Science and Technology Program in Higher Education of Guangzhou [1201420982]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, batch experiments were conducted to compare the effect of temperature and substrate source on microbial communities in the anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste. The results showed that the microbial communities of anaerobic digestion were not sensitive to varied sources of waste, but shifted with the change in operating temperatures. In the reactors operated at mesophilic conditions, Levilinea, Syntrophomonas, Methanothrbc, and Methanosphaerula, etc. were the dominant microbes during the process. While in thermophilic reactors, Levilinea, Ornatilinea, Methanosphaerula and Methanomassiliicoccus, etc. prevailed. Meanwhile, an enrichment in Coprothermobacter, Defluviitoga, Defluviitalea, Tepidimicrobium, Lutispora and Fonticella were observed as the temperature changed from mesophilic to thermophilic, suggesting these genera could be selectively enriched at thermophilic conditions. The results provided fundamental understanding of the microbiology that could support the scale up of food waste anaerobic digestion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available