4.8 Article

Free ammonia inhibition in microalgae and cyanobacteria grown in wastewaters: Photo-respirometric evaluation and modelling

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123046

Keywords

Free ammonia inhibition; Photosynthetic oxygenation modelling; Wastewater treatment; Microalgae and cyanobacteria; Algae/bacteria consortia

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariplo (Project Il Polo delle Microalghe -The Microalgae Hub)
  2. Spanish Ministries of Education, Culture and Sport, and Economy and Competitiveness [FPU18/04941, FJCI-2016-30997]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhibitory effects of free ammonia (FA) on microalgae/cyanobacteria in wastewater-treating photobioreactors (PBR) can strongly reduce their treatment efficiency, increasing the operational costs and undermining the stability of the system. Although FA-promoting conditions (high pH, temperature and ammoniacal nitrogen concentration) are commonly met in outdoor PBRs, photosynthesis inhibition from FA has been scarcely explored and is rarely considered in microalgae-bacteria growth models. Two pilot systems and a series of lab-scale monocultures were tested using a photo-respirometry approach, to evaluate the effects of FA (8.5-136 mg NH3 L-1) on photosynthesis. Two mathematical inhibition models were compared, with the aim of selecting best-fitting equations to describe photo-respirometric experiments. A set of calibrated inhibition parameters was obtained for microalgae and cyanobacteria, growing in monocultures or in mixed algae-bacteria consortia. Cyanobacteria were more sensitive to FA than green microalgae and mixed phototrophs-bacteria consortia showed a higher resistance compared to monocultures. Estimated inhibition parameters were used to describe common operational/environmental conditions in algae-bacteria systems, demonstrating the potential drop in photosynthetic activity under those relevant operational conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available