4.7 Review

Four Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Are They Different?

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages 667-677

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.06.031

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [MH106435, MH045573]
  2. MRC [MR/L009013/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the similarities and differences across four deep brain stimulation targets, finding that these targets generally involve similar connections but also have some unique connections. Delineating the similarities and differences across targets is critical for evaluating and comparing their effectiveness and how circuits contribute to therapeutic outcomes.
Deep brain stimulation is a promising therapeutic approach for patients with treatment-resistant obsessive compulsive disorder, a condition linked to abnormalities in corticobasal ganglia networks. Effective targets are placed in one of four subcortical areas with the goal of capturing prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and basal ganglia connections linked to the limbic system. These include the anterior limb of the internal capsule, the ventral striatum, the subthalamic nucleus, and a midbrain target. The goal of this review is to examine these 4 targets with respect to the similarities and differences of their connections. Following a review of the connections for each target based on anatomic studies in nonhuman primates, we examine the accuracy of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography to replicate those connections in nonhuman primates, before evaluating the connections in the human brain based on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography. Results demonstrate that the four targets generally involve similar connections, all of which are part of the internal capsule. Nonetheless, some connections are unique to each site. Delineating the similarities and differences across targets is a critical step for evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of each and how circuits contribute to the therapeutic outcome. It also underscores the importance that the terminology used for each target accurately reflects its position and its anatomic connections, so as to enable comparisons across clinical studies and for basic scientists to probe mechanisms underlying deep brain stimulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available