4.3 Article

Low Viability of Cholera Toxin-Producing Vibrio cholerae Olin the Artificial Low Ionic Strength Aquatic Solution

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 1288-1291

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b20-00350

Keywords

Vibrio cholerae; cholera toxin; aquatic solution; viability

Funding

  1. Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J -GRID)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP18fm0108002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been well known that Vibrio cholerae inhabit in environmental water. As many patients infected with cholera toxin-producing V cholerae O1 (toxigenic V cholerae O1) emerge in Kolkata, India, it has been thought that toxigenic cholerae O1 is easily detected in environmental water in Kolkata. However, we could not isolate toxigenic V cholerae O1 from environmental water in Kolkata, though NAG Vibrio (generic name of V cholerae non-O1/non-O139) is constantly detected. To clear the reason for the non-isolation of toxigenic V cholerae O1, we examined the viability of V. cholera O1 and NAG Vibrios in the artificial low ionic strength aquatic solution. We found that the viability of toxigenic V cholerae Olin the solution is low, but that of NAG Vibrios is high. Subsequently, we examined the viability of NAG Vibrios possessing cholera toxin gene (ctx) in the same condition and found that the viability of these NAG Vibrios is low. These results indicate that the existence of ctx in V. cholerae affects the viability of V. cholerae in the aquatic solution used in this experiment. We thought that there was closely relation between the low viability of toxigenic V cholerae O1 in the artificial low ionic strength aquatic solution and the low frequency of isolation of the strain from environmental water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available