4.7 Article

Modeling circRNA expression pattern with integrated sequence and epigenetic features demonstrates the potential involvement of H3K79me2 in circRNA expression

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 36, Issue 18, Pages 4739-4748

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa567

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871264, 31701095, 31771399]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LGF18C060002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: CircRNAs are an abundant class of non-coding RNAs with widespread, cell-/tissue-specific patterns. Previous work suggested that epigenetic features might be related to circRNA expression. However, the contribution of epigenetic changes to circRNA expression has not been investigated systematically. Here, we built a machine learning framework named CIRCScan, to predict circRNA expression in various cell lines based on the sequence and epigenetic features. Results: The predicted accuracy of the expression status models was high with area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values of 0.89-0.92 and the false-positive rates of 0.17-0.25. Predicted expressed circRNAs were further validated by RNA-seq data. The performance of expression-level prediction models was also good with normalized root-mean-square errors of 0.28-0.30 and Pearson's correlation coefficient r over 0.4 in all cell lines, along with Spearman's correlation coefficient rho of 0.33-0.46. Noteworthy, H3K79me2 was highly ranked in modeling both circRNA expression status and levels across different cells. Further analysis in additional nine cell lines demonstrated a significant enrichment of H3K79me2 in circRNA flanking intron regions, supporting the potential involvement of H3K79me2 in circRNA expression regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available