4.5 Article

Stability of concentration-related self-interstitial atoms in fusion material tungsten

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS B
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/25/5/056102

Keywords

irradiation; self-interstitial atoms; fusion material; tungsten

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China [A0920502051411-5, 2682014ZT30]
  2. Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation, China [2013DFA51050]
  3. National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program, China [2011GB112001, 2013GB110001]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2014AA032701]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11405138]
  6. Southwestern Institute of Physics Funds, China
  7. Western Superconducting Technologies Company Limited, China
  8. Qingmiao Plan of Southwest Jiaotong University, China [A0920502051517-6]
  9. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560813]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the density functional theory, we calculated the structures of the two main possible self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) as well as the migration energy of tungsten (W) atoms. It was found that the difference of the < 110 > and < 111 > formation energies is 0.05-0.3 eV. Further analysis indicated that the stability of SIAs is closely related to the concentration of the defect. When the concentration of the point defect is high, < 110 > SIAs are more likely to exist, < 111 > SIAs are the opposite. In addition, the vacancy migration probability and self-recovery zones for these SIAs were researched by making a detailed comparison. The calculation provided a new viewpoint about the stability of point defects for self-interstitial configurations and would benefit the understanding of the control mechanism of defect behavior for this novel fusion material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available