4.7 Article

Similarity search and performance prediction of shield tunnels in operation through time series data mining

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103178

Keywords

Tunnel Serviceability Index (TSI); Clustering analysis; Deep learning network; Dynamic time wrapping; Long Short-Term Memory

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30919011249]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478341]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program (973 Program) [2011CB013800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Performance analysis and prediction of shield tunnels in operation have become increasingly important during the maintenance strategy planning process. An existing assessment indicator, Tunnel Serviceability Index (TSI), was employed to evaluate the condition of shield tunnels in soft soils in this study. Data mining methods including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and clustering analysis based on Dynamic Time Wrapping (DTW) were utilized to identify the different degradation patterns and predict the performance of shield tunnels. The data mining methods were applied to 4 tunnel intervals of Shanghai Metro Line 1. Four degradation patterns were determined objectively through the clustering approach, each of which showed similar trends and characteristics. Based on the distribution of clusters, interval 2 was determined to have the worst overall condition. The LSTM network was used for performance prediction in each cluster. Compared with the traditional multilayer neural network, the LSTM also exhibited good prediction effectiveness. The predicted data are well consistent with the observed data with correlation coefficient R-2 equaling to 88.4%. Finally, a case study using the data from Shanghai Metro Line 2 is conducted for further validation of the above data mining methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available