4.5 Article

A Unified Model for Stress-Driven Rearrangement Instabilities

Journal

ARCHIVE FOR RATIONAL MECHANICS AND ANALYSIS
Volume 238, Issue 1, Pages 415-488

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-020-01546-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 29681, M 2571N32]
  2. Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF)
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  4. City of Vienna
  5. BMBWF through the OeAD-WTZ project [HR 08/2020]
  6. Berndorf Privatstiftung [MA16-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A variational model to simultaneously treat Stress-Driven Rearrangement Instabilities, such as boundary discontinuities, internal cracks, external filaments, edge delamination, wetting, and brittle fractures, is introduced. The model is characterized by an energy displaying both elastic and surface terms, and allows for a unified treatment of a wide range of settings, from epitaxially-strained thin films to crystalline cavities, and from capillarity problems to fracture models. The existence of minimizing configurations is established by adopting the direct method of the Calculus of Variations. The compactness of energy-equibounded sequences and energy lower semicontinuity are shown with respect to a proper selected topology in a class of admissible configurations that extends the classes previously considered in the literature. In particular, graph-like constraints previously considered for the setting of thin films and crystalline cavities are substituted by the more general assumption that the free crystalline interface is the boundary, consisting of an at most fixed finite numbermof connected components, of sets of finite perimeter. Finally, it is shown that, as m ->infinity, the energy of minimal admissible configurations tends to the minimum energy in the general class of configurations without the bound on the number of connected components for the free interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available