4.5 Article

Are egg production and respiration of the marine pelagic copepodAcartia steueriinfluenced by crowding?

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 3741-3750

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.14723

Keywords

calanoid copepod; copepod culture; crowding effect; hatching success; metabolism; resting eggs

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)/Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) [JPMJSA1509]
  2. Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society [2019-4093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The understanding of the biological responses of copepods under crowding conditions contributes to establish their stable cultures at high densities for aquaculture industry, which are preferred live feeds for fish larvae. The present study investigated survivorship, fecundity, hatching success and respiration rate, ofAcartia steueriraised under five densities, from 100 to 2,000 ind. L-1, to clarify the biological responses of the copepod under dense culture. There were no significant differences in survival, fecundity and hatching success among all density conditions, whereas the respiration rate at 2,000 ind. L(-1)decreased by 80% as compared with a condition at 100 ind. L-1. The female copepods raised under a copepod density of >500 ind. L(-1)probably invested a larger proportion of energy in reproduction in relation to total assimilated energy as compared with females under lower copepod densities. This change of energy allocation may allowA. steueriunder high densities to maintain high fecundity.Acartia steuerimight be a promising species for dense culture because its mortality and fecundity were independent of the effect of crowding, and the density-dependent reduction in the metabolic rate might increase reproductive investment to maintain a constant rate of reproduction even under high densities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available