4.6 Article

Evolution of PERC from Al-BSF: optimization based on root cause analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-020-03747-4

Keywords

Al-BSF; PERC; Passivation; Al2O3; Solar cell

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [DST/TM/CERI/D09(G)]
  2. project DST Solar PV Hub at IIEST
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India [08/003(0127)/2018-EMR-I]
  4. University Grant Commission (UGC, Govt. of India)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passivated emitter rear contact (PERC) solar cell involves upgraded adaptation of technology over the existing silicon wafer-based aluminium back surface field (Al-BSF) solar cell. The lower efficiency of Al-BSF is caused by a few drawbacks e.g. higher rear surface recombination and weaker electric field at the rear surface. These technical shortcomings can be mitigated by incorporating field-effect passivation (FEP) layer viz. aluminium oxide (Al2O3) at the rear surface with a capping layer of SiN(X)on it. Conventionally two new processing steps utilizing two expensive equipments, green laser (532 nm) for laser ablation of the FEP and SiN(X)capping layer stack at the rear surface and single side etcher for rear side polishing of wafer are used for manufacturing of PERC cells. In this paper, we have shown that instead of these two new expensive processing equipments we can use the IR laser (1024 nm) and RIE etcher, which are commonly available for Al-BSF manufacturing line, for the fabrication of PERC solar cells. Using p-type wafers of rather modest quality (minority carrier lifetime of >= 10 mu s) we have demonstrated improvement of the efficiency from 18.71 to 19.62% and enhancements inV(OC)andJ(SC)from 628 to 646 mV and 38.59 mA/cm(2)to 39.82 mA/cm(2), respectively. A thorough root-cause analysis has been carried out to optimize the two new approaches within the existing Al-BSF line for the fabrication of PERC solar cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available