4.7 Article

Deriving priorities from pairwise comparison matrices with a novel consistency index

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION
Volume 374, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125059

Keywords

Pairwise comparison matrix (PCM); Double cosine similarity measure (DCSM); Consistency index; Prioritization method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571054, 71871072]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [2016GXNSFFA380 004]
  3. Guangxi high school innovation team and outstanding scholars plan
  4. innovation project of Guangxi Graduate Education [YCSW2019045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is important to measure the inconsistency level of a pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) and derive the priority vector in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In the present study, a new consistency index is proposed by using the cosine similarity measures of two row/column vectors in a PCM. It is called as the double cosine similarity consistency index (DCSCI) since the row and column vectors are all considered. Some interesting properties of DCSCI are investigated and the thresholds for inconsistency tolerance level are discussed in detail. Then following the idea of DCSCI, we provide a new method for obtaining the priority vector from a PCM. Through maximizing the sum of the cosine similarity measures between the priority vector and the row/column vectors, the priority vector is derived by solving the constructed optimization problem. By analyzing the proposed double cosine similarity maximization (DCSM) method, it is found that the existing cosine maximization (CM) method can be retrieved. By carrying out numerical examples, some comparisons with the existing methods show that the proposed index and method are effective and flexible. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available