4.7 Article

Optimization design method for kirigami-inspired space deployable structures with cylindrical surfaces

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 1575-1598

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.005

Keywords

Kirigami; Aerospace; Deployable structure; Cylindrical surface structure; Optimization design

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1304600]
  2. Tianjin Science and Technology Committee [18PTZWHZ00160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel space cylindrical surface deployable structure inspired by kirigami art, along with an optimization design method. The method can be applied to design deployable structures for aerospace engineering, with a large deployment ratio and a few degrees of freedom.
Space deployable structures are widely used in aerospace engineering, which have been addressed new folding methods, such as spatial overconstrained linkages and origami structures. This paper proposes a novel kirigami-inspired space cylindrical surface deployable structure with a large deployment ratio and a few degrees of freedom, as well as its optimization design method. Based on the thick panel kirigami model proposed in our previous study, a kirigami network is presented. The construction of a physical model based on a kirigami network is discussed. A mathematical model to describe the deployed surfaces of the physical model is provided, and an optimization design method for cylindrical surface deployable structures based on the kirigami network is proposed. Finally, the prototypes of a parabolic cylindrical antenna and a cylindrical antenna are constructed based on the proposed optimization design method as an example. Our study provides a new method of designing cylindrical surface deployable structures for aerospace engineering applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available