4.8 Article

Power-generating trees: Direct bioelectricity production from plants with microbial fuel cells

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115040

Keywords

Plant-microbial fuel cell; Stem-couple; Bioelectricity production; Commensalism; Energy plant; Biosensing

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plans of Special Project for Site Soils [2018YFC1800600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876050]
  3. Special Fund from State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [18K10ESPCT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although plant-microbial fuel cells (PMFCs) have been considered as an alternative approach to utilize plants as an energy source, the application of a conventional PMFC coupled with rhizodeposits is immensely limited by environmental factors and plant species. In this research, we suggested a new concept for a device that can directly generate continuous bioelectricity from the plant stem associated with microbial fuel cells (MFCs), in which Pachira macrocarpa and Populus alba were employed. Compared with a conventional PMFC, the novel PMFC coupled with the plant stems produced more stable and continuous bioelectricity without oscillatory behaviour as well as a much shorter start-up period. The stem-coupled PMFCs produced bioelectricity that were operated at least 40 days. P. alba coupled PMFC showed higher power output compared to P. macrocarpa counterparts and the maximal power densities were 7.61 mW m(-2) and 3.60 mW m(-2) anode surface, respectively. Besides, we explored the response of the novel PMFC to different substrate concentrations and observed that the cell voltage effectively increased after the injection of moderate substrate concentrations. Moreover, the anodic bacteria formed a commensal relationship with the plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available