4.8 Article

In-situ measurement of electrode kinetics in porous electrode for vanadium flow batteries using symmetrical cell design

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 272, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115093

Keywords

Vanadium flow battery; In-situ measurement; Electrode kinetics; Porous electrode; Symmetrical cell; Finite element analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706266, 21805290]
  2. Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrode kinetics are crucial to electrochemical performance of vanadium flow battery. However, existing studies on electrode kinetics are mostly performed in ex-situ conditions based on planar electrodes, so the obtained rate constant can neither reflect the kinetics in practically used porous electrode nor be used to predict the activation polarizations of a real flow cell. To address this limitation, an in-situ measurement of electrode kinetics in porous electrode is conducted in this study by a symmetrical cell design for vanadium flow battery. For both V2+/V3+ and VO2+/VO2+ couples, the activation polarization as a function of current density is firstly acquired on the symmetrical cell through measurements of polarization curve, high frequency resistance and local mass transfer coefficient, followed by Tafel fitting that yields both rate constant and transfer coefficient. Based on kinetic parameters of both V2+/V3+ and VO2+/VO2+, the simulated full cell activation polarizations coincide well with the full cell experimental result. By further comparing to simulation results using reported kinetic parameters determined from planar electrodes, the reliability of the proposed method is further highlighted. The electrode evaluation is much more involved than Tafel polarization and stack design is not treated in this contribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available