4.5 Review Book Chapter

The Cosmic Baryon and Metal Cycles

Journal

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014

Keywords

baryon density; atomic and molecular gas; cosmic abundances; galaxy chemical evolution; interstellar dust; quasar absorption line spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. NSF [AST-1517353]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Characterizing the relationship between stars, gas, and metals in galaxies is a critical component of understanding the cosmic baryon cycle. We compile contemporary censuses of the baryons in collapsed structures and their chemical makeup and dust content. We show the following: The Hi mass density of the Universe is well determined to redshifts z approximate to 5 and shows minor evolution with time. New observations of molecular hydrogen reveal its evolution mirrors that of the global starformation rate density, implying a universal cosmic molecular gas depletion timescale. The low-redshift decline of the star-formation history is thus driven by the lack of molecular gas supply due to a drop in net accretion rate related to the decreased growth of dark matter halos. The metal mass density in cold gas (T less than or similar to 10(4) K) contains virtually all the metals produced by stars for z greater than or similar to 2.5. At lower redshifts, the contributors to the total amount of metals are more diverse; at z < 1, most of the observed metals are bound in stars. Overall, there is little evidence for a missing metals problem in modern censuses. We characterize the dust content of neutral gas over cosmic time, finding the dust-to-gas and dust-to-metals ratios fall with decreasing metallicity. We calculate the cosmological dust mass density in the neutral gas up to z approximate to 5. There is good agreement between multiple tracers of the dust content of the Universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available