4.8 Article

Electrocatalytic CO2Reduction on CuOxNanocubes: Tracking the Evolution of Chemical State, Geometric Structure, and Catalytic Selectivity using Operando Spectroscopy

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 59, Issue 41, Pages 17974-17983

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202007136

Keywords

CO(2)reduction; copper; electrocatalysis; nanocubes; operando spectroscopy

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) [033RC004E, 033RCOO4D, 03SF0523C]
  2. European Research Council [ERC-725915]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EXC 2008/1 -390540038]
  4. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The direct electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) into multi-carbon (C2+) products still faces fundamental and technological challenges. While facet-controlled and oxide-derived Cu materials have been touted as promising catalysts, their stability has remained problematic and poorly understood. Herein we uncover changes in the chemical and morphological state of supported and unsupported Cu2O nanocubes during operation in low-current H-Cells and in high-current gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) using neutral pH buffer conditions. While unsupported nanocubes achieved a sustained C(2+)Faradaic efficiency of around 60 % for 40 h, the dispersion on a carbon support sharply shifted the selectivity pattern towards C(1)products. Operando XAS and time-resolved electron microscopy revealed the degradation of the cubic shape and, in the presence of a carbon support, the formation of small Cu-seeds during the surprisingly slow reduction of bulk Cu2O. The initially (100)-rich facet structure has presumably no controlling role on the catalytic selectivity, whereas the oxide-derived generation of under-coordinated lattice defects, can support the high C(2+)product yields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available